As a religious institution and place of worship,the temple in India has had a hoary past.As a structure that enshrines a god or some other object of veneration, circumambulation (pradakshina)
,adoration and worship(puja),it has had a varied growth in different parts of the subcontinent.
this was according to the local needs and credal requirements and subject,of course,to the interplay or exchange of thoughts and ideas.tho
ugh fundamentally the basic elements of the temples and the worship in them derived mostly from vadic and puranic sources, in course of centuries they assumed different styles and patterns during their diffusion over wide areas from the cradle centers of the great indian religions in north indian. the rise of the protestant cults of jainis
mand buddhism during the pre-christian epoch and the development of their own versions of legends,creeds,forms of deities,rituals and the like,resulted in their adaptation of one kind or another of the temple form and its adjuncts as suited the object of their particular worship and its glorification,for essentially the temle in its form and layout dep
ended on the object of veneration installed and the method adopted for its worship.the three creeds being indigenous,and not exotic,had not to derive the basic forms of their temples from any where except from their own land of origin.All the three,while retaining the common indian plans and elevations,and the native principles and techniques of construction,had,however,to show their forms and through emphasis on the futures of the cognitions of 
the respective creeds in the general make-up and content of the structure.The builder or the craftsmen-'"sthapatis and the silpins"-who belonged to the same guilds of artisans,had common principles and set methods of design and construction and they worked in collaboration with the priesthood which kne
w the rituals,the nature of the object of veneration,and the modes of their worship.They together determined the forms of the temples with such modifications as suited the respective cases,as also the fixation of the features of the principal deities and the decorations of the structure with iconic and other sculptural embellishments.As a result ,the vastu, silpa and agama texts and canons as described in the sastras were evolved.All that was known and necessary in the creation of the temple and the conduct of worship therein was codified,Thu
s to the Indian mind the indigenous architecture remains basically and essentially Indian.It cannot be sub-divided into what is usually attempted to be made out as hindu,jain,or buddhist architecture.The organized religions, hinduism, jainism and buddhism did in their early stages of growth,spread into the southern peninsula across the vindhyan barrier of mountains and forests, because of their own vitality, in successive waves, merging in to the religions of the south which had viable cultures,social patterns,traditions and religious beliefs of their own ,not to
speak of a language that could flower in to its own literature, independently of every other factor.A greater impetus to these contacts was given by the Mauryan conquests that reached the northern borders of the Mysore plateau, beyond which Asoka,the great patron of Buddhism, recognized viable, stable and organized kingdoms of the far south, with their own indigenous culture. He treated as friendly neighbours across the border among whom he could spread his message through his southern administrators.The tradition of rock-cut architecture and excavation into living rocks of chaityas and viharas of the Buddhists initiated by Asoka near Gaya was soon taken up in the trap-rock regions of the Deccan and western India, reproducing aspects of contemprary brick-and-timber originals which, because of the perishable nature of the fabric of their construction, did not survive the march of time. This expression of forms of architecture and sculpture through the permanent medium of stone, adopted earlier by the Buddhists, then by the HIndus and the Jains, has enabled the monuments to last for centuries and give us a fairly good idea of what the contemporary religious architecture and sculpture in general was. The brick-built stupas and chaityas, which are in essence temples, in the eastern Andhra and northern Karnataka regions, too, have survived bec
ause of the adoption of stone for their protective casing and sculptured veneer, not to mention the stone railings which totally imitated timber work in their joinery and fixtures. In these cases stone cannot be said to have gone into actual construction which was still of brick. These stupas and chaityas show their own distinct regional characters as against their compeers in north and north-western India.From the sixth and seventh centuries A.D,the Hindus and Jains of the south too adopted the stone mwdium,and started excavating rock-cut cave-temples,or carving out rock-cut monolithic temple forms ,and ultimately building them of stone.We have a long series of such stone temples created in close succession and extending uninterruptedly through the past thirteen centuries ,surviving in their thousands all over the peninsula,more to the far south where m
ost of them are still in use.The comparitive freedom from foreign invations and disruption in this part of india and the relative streangth of the kingdoms and the society were some of the contributing factors.Even the early hindu and jain temples came into being under the royal patronage of the rulers of the three great empires of the south -the chalukyas,the pallavas,and the pandyas-along with the lesser kingdoms wedged in between.The spirit was soon caught up by the nobility,the mercantile corporations and the agricultural trade,and artisan guilds that flourished during those times.The result was that a chain of temples ,great and small,studded every village and town of the south,which thus came to be known as the land of temples.The temples were documented by their own expressive and detailed inscriptions,again their thousands.Temples from the chola times became the very hub of the rural and urban life in all ats aspects-religious, cultural,social,economic and educational -and thus became the repository of all that was best in fabric,architecture,sculpture and other arts.Buddhism almost went in to complete eclipse soon;the hindu temples to a greater extent and the jain ones to a lesser extent predominating.There had been ,of course ,a natural interchange of ideas and usages among the three during their periods of development and growth in the region on a matrix thatwas essentially indigenous.The buddha,for instance,was adopted as the ninth of the ten incarnations of vishnu in the hindu pantheon in place of krishna,who came to be considered as the whole aspect of vishnu.This is testified by a pallava inscription of the seventh century of A.D in one of the early cave-temples at mahabal
ipuram.Then again,buddhist tantric rituals percolated in to the hindu modes of worship.The jain had by then established their sangas at madurai,and even earlier their creed of the digambara persuasion had centred principally in sravana belagola in mysore with its affiliates and branches- the guchchhas radiating in to andhra,karnataka,tamilnadu,and kerala.Hinduism witnessed agreat revival under the saiva saints(nayanmars)and the vaishnava saints(alwars) who were soon defined and become part and parcel of the pantheon and in the ritual and calender of festivals. Sankara ,the great philosopher and teacher ,also reformed the popular hindu creeds -the sanmatha and the model of the related worship.With such a back ground the growth of temples and organized temple worship became truly phenomenal.